« Scary stuff on the news | Main | Touching Base »

April 15, 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

sligo

To look at such language in a bill and imagine that it has anything to do with educating children or with teachers' "performance" is to deceive oneself. Such a bill has one intent: dismantle collective bargaining and get rid of older teachers, who cost too much.

The vague language is there for one reason--to give all hiring and firing power to the administrator, and eliminate any role for collective bargaining. It's a power play, and nothing more.

ShadowDancer

The rest of the bill DOES have stuff on retaining collective
bargaining for the teachers. I merely failed to quote the whole
shebang.

I think collective bargaining is important. I also think that
making sure we have GOOD teachers in the classrooms is important. I
dont think theyre mutually exclusive.

janna

There's so much more to being a good teacher than standardized test scores. Yes, schools should certainly be able to hire the teachers they need, not just the one with the most experience, but that teacher is not necessarily the one whose class made the most impressive jump on test scores.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Fiber Dancer Designs

Ads

Blogiversary Flick'r

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public items from needledancer tagged with 2008. Make your own badge here.
  • Get your own free Blogoversary button!

KAL's






September 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Visitors